A portfolio view of retention, proven by comparing two parts of your base.
You care about GGR, LTV and whether a spend beats doing nothing. Retivo gives a per-brand, per-portfolio read and measures its own uplift, so a pilot is judged on numbers.
The question is always "did it pay?"
Across brands and geos, you need to know where value sits, where budget leaks, and whether a new tool actually moved the number or just looked busy.
Value, portfolio and a measured pilot.
LTV and GGR view
Where projected value concentrates across players, brands and geos.
Multi-brand
One layer over several brands, each on its own data, without a rip-and-replace.
Measured pilot ROI
We start on part of your base while the rest carry on, then compare both parts, so the pilot is judged on uplift, not a slide.
Priced to work where per-user tools break.
Per-user tools charge for every player - at Tier-3 ARPU (India, Africa, a player worth about $5) that math does not close. Retivo stays affordable where per-user pricing breaks, so a portfolio of low-ARPU brands is actually workable. Affordable by design, not a guaranteed payback.
Run a pilot that has to prove itself, then scale what worked.
The layer sits on top of your CRM, holds no PII, and reports uplift by starting on part of your base while the rest carry on, then comparing both parts and showing the GGR difference. If the pilot does not beat manual, the numbers say so before you commit further.
Run a pilot judged on uplift.
We deploy on your stack, start on part of your base while the rest carry on, compare both parts, and you decide on the number.
Book a demo